Lectionary
readings: Hebrews 13:1-8, 15-16 and Luke 14:1, 7-14
Our
readings today are concerned with table manners.
I
remember, from my childhood, all manner of table manners. Don’t put your elbows
on the table. The proper and highly improper way to hold and use a fork. That
kind of thing.
Our
Gospel reading recounts one occasion when Jesus went to eat at the house of a
leading Pharisee. This is not the first time, in Luke’s Gospel, that Jesus has been
a dinner guest in the home of a Pharisee. Moreover, we’ve encountered Pharisees
among a large gathering in the home where Jesus was resident. But we’ve also
seen Jesus eating in the homes of various other people—tax collectors; two
adult and yet unmarried sisters—at least some of whom at least some
Pharisees felt uncomfortable with.
The
Pharisees were a grass-roots social movement that resisted the influence of
Greco-Roman culture on Judaism, and emphasised the importance of interpreting
the Torah—the Law given through Moses—for everyday Jewish life in their own
day, prioritising that over the rituals of the temple in Jerusalem. They were
sincere people, mature in faith. And they were of mixed opinion, in relation to
Jesus. Some saw in him a natural ally, one of them even. Others saw him as a
threat, a fifth columnist, as it were. Almost certainly, some Pharisees were,
initially, supportive of Jesus, but later distanced themselves and even opposed
him outright, both openly and clandestinely. In the passage immediately prior to
today’s reading, a group of Pharisees seek to save Jesus’ life. In our passage
today, Jesus encounters both invitation and close, critical examination. We
need to resist viewing this group in simplistic and negative terms. Their
motives are, for the most part, good; but good people can do terrible things;
and they have yet to move from devout lives to lives totally surrendered to the
will of God. Like many good people, they enjoy the rewards of goodness—they
take their compensation for goodness—in material comfort and social standing.
Jesus
goes to the house of a leading Pharisee, and observes how the guests chose the
places of honour. A formal meal like this would have involved reclining at
three couches around a table, one side kept open for serving from, with the
host on the left-hand couch and guests arranged on the other couches in a
strict order from most-to-least important. As Luke tells it, Jesus is watching
a deliberate act of picking out the best positions at the table, perhaps even
arguing over them. Ordinarily, the host would set the seating plan. This would
suggest that either the host had chosen not to take part in this social
convention, or that several of his guests were choosing to snub their host.
Either would be shocking.
Jesus
first addresses the other guests, telling them a parable of comedic
exaggeration. Rather than fight over the best seat, he advises, head straight
for the lowest place. At first, this sounds like a magnificent manipulation, to
guarantee not only a better seat but a public commendation by the host, to
boot. But on reflection, it exposes the whole system by throwing it into
anxiety. To sit in the place not chosen for you is to dishonour your host,
exposes them (and you) to shame, whether one sits up or down (hence the
host must intervene to restore right social order). And those who buy-into the
honour-shame economy experience a perpetual rising and falling, taking great
pride in their humility: it is a classic Catch-22 situation.
Leaving
the other guests trying to square the circle, Jesus turns to his host, with
advice on how to conduct future dinner parties. Don’t invite the usual
suspects, those guests whose presence will either cement your social standing
or facilitate your social climbing. Instead, invite those who have no means to
reciprocate, no means to repay a social debt. It is worth noting that, if this
host has indeed chosen not to set out a seating plan, he is already well on the
journey of renouncing worldly values in favour of the kingdom of heaven.
But
Jesus’ instruction to him is not simply, ‘use your table as a means of social justice,
not social status.’ The Pharisees were deeply committed to living
according to the Torah. They were already deeply committed to social
justice. Jesus has no doubt that his host is a righteous man, and will share in
the resurrection of the righteous: nonetheless, Jesus invites him into a deeper-still
experience of God’s reordered society. It is entirely possible to pursue social
justice without compassion; to do what is right because it is right, while
still lacking what Jesus elsewhere calls the perfection of compassion.
Jesus is not rebuking his host—as he rebuked his fellow-guests—but inviting him
to move beyond being good to being perfect*.
The
only way to be exalted in the kingdom of heaven is at the freely given
recommendation of the poor, who are the disguised messengers of God. In view of
this status conferred upon them, we are wise to honour the humble, we are wise to
hear the exhortation written to the Hebrews, those
geographically-dispersed, culturally-Jewish converts to Christianity: do not
neglect searching out the strangers in your community, ensuring that their
needs are met; remember those in prison and those being tortured; honour the
sanctity of your neighbours’ marriages; do not neglect doing good and sharing
what you have. And yet, the moment we do these things without compassion, out
of duty but lacking love, in hope of gain, Jesus takes us aside and points us
to the lower place, which is a higher place.
Whenever
we welcome Jesus to our table, we discover, sooner or later, that he is in fact
the one who has welcomed us into the home of the Father, to our Father’s table.
And if we are genuinely desirous of pleasing God, he will draw us aside and re-orientate
us to love. To love of those who are not there—and to the love that does not
draw back from the poverty and woundedness of those who are there with
us, but reaches out to make each one whole.
We
may, indeed, have known people who live such lives; and we do well to imitate
their faith until, after much rehearsal and many performances, it may become
second nature to us also.
Today,
where are you in the story? Are you one of the guests, whose fault Jesus
graciously exposes, in order to set you free from sin? Are you the host, whose
desire to please God Jesus rewards with the invitation to experience and enjoy greater
freedom yet? Are you the poor, the crippled, lame and blind, called to the
banquet, to taste very God? Wherever you are in the story today, this story is
for you; and it is good news. So come to the table, eat and drink.
*As
Ronald Rolheiser points out in Sacred Fire, the Greek notion of
perfection is one of flawless ideal which is unobtainable in reality, whereas
the Hebrew understanding of perfection is robust compassion, to which we are
called. Generally, we recoil from Jesus’ words because we have the Greek notion
in mind—though, if we are honest, we might recoil further still if we held the
Hebrew understanding instead.