Sunday 27 August 2017

Eleventh Sunday after Trinity 2017

A sermon first preached at St Gabriel’s Church, Bishopwearmouth.


Last week a small article caught my eye in the Church Times. It read:

Pagans demand restitution
A group of pagans have written to the Archbishops and several bishops asking for a public apology for what they claim is “centuries of persecution”, and that two Church of England churches be given to them to turn back into temples. The Odinist Fellowship, a charity that promotes English paganism, has accused the C of E of attempting a “spiritual genocide” during the conversion of England in the seventh century, and of turning pagan temples into today’s parish churches. “The Church has never come to terms with its past crimes,” the Fellowship’s director, Ralph Harrison, said.

Church Times 18 August 2017

Now, that might sound bizarre or even quite funny, and—at least, as reported—somewhat confused about history, but, given our reading from Acts this evening, I took a closer look at the Odinist Fellowship.

They are registered as a charity and as an official religion in England and Wales, with the legal protection from discrimination that being an officially-recognised religion provides.

They worship the northern European gods we might recognise as belonging to Norse mythology, gods and goddesses such as Tyr, Odin, Thor, and Frigg, after whom we name days of the week. These they consider to be our indigenous deities, brought by the Anglo-Saxons, and as opposed to Christianity and Islam, which they see as hostile immigrant religions.

They believe these gods and goddesses to be “true gods, divine, living, spiritual entities, endowed with power and intelligence, able and willing to intervene in the course of Nature and of human lives” [see odinistfellowship.co.uk] and in the mythologies not as literal figures and events but as human attempts to understand and speak of the real gods that stand behind the stories.

They hold to Nine Noble Virtues of courage, truth, honour, fidelity, discipline, hospitality, industriousness, self-reliance and perseverance.

They practice sacrifice, of food and drink, understood not as physically feeding spiritual beings but as a sacrament: “that is to say, it is a symbol which effects what it symbolises, and symbolises what it effects. The sacrifice plays an important role in the cosmic conflict between the forces of order and chaos, because the symbolism of ritually offering … life-giving sustenance to the gods actually brings what is symbolically portrayed into effect on the spiritual plane, thereby strengthening the gods’ hand in their eternal struggle against the powers of chaos.” [see odinistfellowship.co.uk].

We might contrast this with the sacrament we will take part in this evening, which we understand to bring into effect in the physical plane what is already determined in the spiritual plane in and through Christ Jesus.

What is at first glance faintly ridiculous is, at second glance, a true and living relationship with the local pantheon of gods. Which is, in and of itself, very interesting, in our post-Christian but also post-secular society.

But at a third glance, we may see something very ugly: the way in which this Teutonic religion sets itself against Christianity as a weak and despised Semitic religion that has failed Britain and left us exposed to the rise of Islam. They repeatedly affirm Odinism as being life-affirming, spiritual, nature-loving, cosmic, ethical, as opposed to Christianity which they present as being none of these things, but, rather, of stealing many of their stories, rites and festivals and debasing them. In Odinism, instead, they proclaim, is the indigenous and true answer to disaffected young people’s spiritual longing.

These are the gods that stand behind the rise of northern European and English nationalism, the resurgence of White Supremacy and its attendant blame-shifting. To be clear, I am not saying that all adherents of Odinism are neo-Nazis; but there is a very strong overlap with far-right fascism, as well as clear parallels with the ‘folk and hearth’ mythos that underpinned the rise of the Nazi movement.

But, you might say to me, these are not gods at all. They are nothing but stories. Not so.

The Bible does not paint for us what might be called philosophical monotheism—the belief that there is only one god; with the correlation that all other gods are either figments of the imagination or alternative approximations of the one god.

Rather, the Bible paints a picture of what we might term creational monotheism—that there is one eternal and creator God, whose creation includes many spiritual beings, or lower-case-g gods, endowed with power, intelligence, and free-will. Some of these choose to love and serve the creator God—Yahweh—while others are in rebellion against him.

Both Old and New Testaments assume a world populated by gods. Many are named, such as Tiamat and Rahab and Chemosh and Baal and the Princes of Persia and Greece; along with others who serve Yahweh, such as Michael, for whom the Minster where I am based is named, or Gabriel, after whom this place is named (we tend to call these gods ‘angels’ but that term comes with a great deal of unhelpful cultural baggage).

Other descriptions of gods include the Angel of the Lord, the Angel of Death, the Council of Heaven, the Sons of God, the satan (which might be a role, rather than an individual), the powers and principalities of the heavenly realms, and the unclean spirits Jesus drives out before him again and again.

In the plagues of Egypt, Yahweh takes on and overthrows one member of the Egyptian pantheon after another, culminating with Ra the sun god and the divine image-bearers Pharaoh and his first-born son.

The Ten Commandments assume the existence of many gods. The first is an injunction to have no gods besides Yahweh—and the sin of Israel is always to turn to other gods along with Yahweh, never instead of Yahweh. The second prohibits idols, images behind which gods stand.

Again and again, the Psalms refer to Yahweh judging the gods for the injustice with which they hold humanity in slavery. The gods are real. Many do not hold us in goodwill: we are to avoid them, as a matter of priority. Others, loyal to Yahweh, support us: but we are not to consider them his equal, for they are created beings like ourselves.

When Paul sees that Athens was full of idols, he was deeply distressed: not because they were wasting their time on things that were not real, but because they were exposing themselves to gods that were very real—albeit, as the Odinists understand, bearing no actual correlation to the idols they stand behind—and those spiritual beings were holding them captive.

Indeed, Paul was so distressed that he abandoned his usual practice of going to the local Jewish community before going to the Gentiles, choosing instead to go to both communities from the start.

His message was that there is one creator God, above all the created gods; a God who does not need us to empower him, but who longs for us to know him as our parent. This God stepped decisively into the world he had created, in the person of Jesus, to set us free and call us into relationship with him.

This Jesus has broken the power of the rebellious gods: they exerted their influence over people to crucify him, but God vindicated this Jesus by raising him from the dead; and in so doing has given assurance that there will be a day when this Jesus judges the world in righteousness, dealing once-and-for-all with the injustice of humans and of the gods.

It is a powerful message; and one that is rather strange. Indeed, on hearing about Jesus and the resurrection—in Greek, anastasis—for the first time, Paul’s audience think he is talking of two new deities, Jesus and his goddess-consort Anastasis. As Paul explains his hope to them, some reject his message, others ask to hear more, and still others became believers.

Regardless of how many Odinists there may be in the UK, we live in a society not dissimilar to that of the Athens Paul visited. The good news of Jesus Christ, widely misunderstood and rejected, is no longer familiar to many. Yet there is an impulse to worship, an awareness of—and engagement with—the predominantly unseen spiritual aspect of creation. There is an interest in magic, in healing powers, in divination, in seeing the future or in contacting the dead.

This is not good news. Promising benevolence, the gods provoke people against people, with the goal of devouring one another. By this, I am not diminishing human free-will and responsibility—Jesus will judge humanity—but I am saying that there is more at work than meets the eye—he will judge the powers and principalities too.

The good news is that God—the one eternal creator God—has not left us alone, but comes to seek and to save: to save us from ourselves, and from the gods.

In a world where we see so much going on that we, so shaped by a secular worldview, find hard to make any sense of;

in a world where many, having been persuaded to disbelieve in the gods, are left blaming the one eternal creator God for so much suffering;

this is a hope that, yes, still divides opinion, but one that sets the captives free. As Simon Peter recognised, in Jesus is eternal life—life in its fullness—for he is the believable, knowable, Holy One of God. In Jesus, the one eternal creator God is made known—relationally known—to us. This is not “spiritual genocide” but spiritual liberation.

The population of Sunderland needs to hear this good news. Are we deeply distressed enough by what we see around us to proclaim it?


No comments:

Post a Comment